UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

Florida		65-0643773
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2 Snunit Street Science Park POB 455
Carmiel, Israel		20100
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

972-4-988-9488

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share		American Stock Exchange

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer   o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller Reporting Company o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     On August 1, 2008, approximately 75,930,235 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, were outstanding.

 

 

FORM 10-Q/A
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		ii
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — As of June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007			1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) — For the Six Months and the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007; and for the Period from December 27, 1993 through June 30, 2008			2
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity — As of June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) — For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007; and for the Period from December 27, 1993 through June 30, 2008			4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			13
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			19
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			20
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			22
Item 1A. Risk Factors			22
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			23
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			23
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			23
Item 5. Other Information			23
Item 6. Exhibits			24
Signatures			26
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION

     Except where the context otherwise requires, the terms, “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company,” refer to the business of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, and “Protalix” or “Protalix Ltd.” refers to the business of Protalix Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary and sole operating unit.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The statements set forth under the captions “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Risk Factors”, and other statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are not historical, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future. When used in this report, the terms “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect” and “intend” and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to our or our subsidiary or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and reflect our views as of the date they are made with respect to future events and financial performance, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable law. Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Examples of the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

	•		the inherent risks and uncertainties in developing drug platforms and products of the type we are developing;
	•		delays in our preparation and filing of applications for regulatory approval;
	•		delays in the approval or potential rejection of any applications we file with the United States Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or other regulatory authorities;
	•		any lack of progress of our research and development (including the results of clinical trials we are conducting);
	•		obtaining on a timely basis sufficient patient enrollment in our clinical trials;
	•		the impact of development of competing therapies and/or technologies by other companies;
	•		our ability to obtain additional financing required to fund our research programs;
	•		the risk that we will not be able to develop a successful sales and marketing organization in a timely manner, if at all;
	•		our ability to establish and maintain strategic license, collaboration and distribution arrangements and to manage our relationships with collaborators, distributors and partners;
	•		potential product liability risks and risks of securing adequate levels of product liability and clinical trial insurance coverage;
	•		the availability of reimbursement to patients from health care payors for our drug products, if approved;
	•		the possibility of infringing a third party’s patents or other intellectual property rights;
	•		the uncertainty of obtaining patents covering our products and processes and in successfully enforcing them against third parties;
	•		the possible disruption of our operations due to terrorist activities and armed conflict, including as a result of the disruption of the operations of regulatory authorities, our subsidiary, our manufacturing facilities and our customers, suppliers, distributors, collaborative partners, licensees and clinical trial sites; and
	•		other risks and uncertainties detailed in Section 1A of this Quarterly Report.

     In addition, companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after obtaining promising earlier trial results. These and other risks and uncertainties are detailed in Section 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and described from time to time in our future reports to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update, and we do not have a policy of updating or revising, these forward-looking statements.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The Company is restating its financial statements for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 by amending its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 to change the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation of non-employees required by SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123R, for certain transactions with nonemployees.

All amendments and restatements to the financial statements are non-cash in nature.

An explanation of the change in accounting treatment and its impact on the Company’s financial statements is contained in Note 2 to the financial statements contained in Item 1 of this report.

The following sections of this Form 10-Q/A have been amended to reflect the restatement:

Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements

Part I — Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Other than as stated above, this Form 10-Q/A continues to speak as of June 30, 2008 or (where applicable) as of the date of the filing of the original Form 10-Q, and the information in this Form 10-Q/A does not modify or update any other item or disclosure in the original Form 10-Q or reflect any other events occurring after the filing of the original Form 10-Q.

This amended Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with any periodic reports that have been filed subsequent to the date of the filing of the original Form 10-Q.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

		June 30, 2008				December 31, 2007
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	53,360			$	61,813
Accounts receivable			1,920				1,354
Total current assets			55,280				63,167
FUNDS IN RESPECT OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT			626				464
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET			5,914				4,506
Total assets		$	61,820			$	68,137
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accruals:
Trade		$	1,714			$	899
Other			2,626				2,863
Total current liabilities			4,340				3,762
LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UPON RETIREMENT			967				690
Total liabilities			5,307				4,452
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY			56,513				63,685
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	61,820			$	68,137

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

																		Period from
																		December 27, 1993*
		Six Months Ended								Three Months Ended								through
		June 30, 2008				June 30, 2007				June 30, 2008				June 30, 2007				June 30, 2008
						(restated)								(restated)				(restated)
REVENUES																		$	830
COST OF REVENUES																			206
GROSS PROFIT																			624
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES (1)		$	9,684			$	6,401			$	4,031			$	3,175				41,986
less — grants			(2,515	)			(1,081	)			(1,149	)			(343	)			(8,702	)
			7,169				5,320				2,882				2,832				33,284
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (2)			3,992				12,755				2,016				6,363				33,588
OPERATING LOSS			11,161				18,075				4,898				9,195				66,248
FINANCIAL INCOME — NET			(1,819	)			(506	)			(669	)			(175	)			(4,267	)
OTHER INCOME							(6	)							(6	)			(6	)
NET LOSS BEFORE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE			9,342				17,563				4,229				9,014				61,975
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE																			(37	)
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD		$	9,342			$	17,563			$	4,229			$	9,014			$	61,938
NET LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK — BASIC AND DILUTED:		$	0.12			$	0.27			$	0.06			$	0.14
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK USED IN COMPUTING LOSS PER SHARE:
Basic and diluted			75,855,594				65,032,809				75,898,295				65,657,181
(1) Includes share-based compensation			672				1,778				(655	)			878				6,056
(2) Includes share-based compensation			1,495				11,266				648				5,616				22,495

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

																										Deficit
																										accumulated
						Convertible								Convertible								Additional				during
		Common				Preferred				Common				Preferred								paid-in				development
		Stock (2)				Shares				Stock				Shares				Warrants				capital				stage				Total
		Number of shares								Amount
Balance at December 27, 1993(1)
Changes during the period from December 27, 1993* through December 31, 2007 (restated):
Common Stock and convertible preferred A, B and C shares and warrants issued for cash (net of issuance costs of $5,078)			38,856,127				398,227			$	39			$	1			$	1,382			$	73,836							$	75,258
Exercise of options granted to employees and non-employees			2,780,467				847				3												408								411
Conversion of convertible preferred shares into common stock			24,375,870				(399,074	)			24				(1	)							(23	)
Change in accounting principle																							(37	)		$	37
Expiration of warrants																			(34	)			34
Merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (net of issuance cost of $642)			583,280								1												240								241
Exercise of warrants			9,171,695								9								(1,348	)			15,342								14,003
Restricted common stock issued for future services			8,000								*												11								11
Share-based compensation																							26,394								26,394
Net loss for the period																											(52,633	)			(52,633	)
Balance at December 31, 2007 (restated)			75,775,439								76												116,205				(52,596	)			63,685
Changes during the six month period ended June 30, 2008 (Unaudited):
Restricted common stock issued for future services																							(5	)							(5	)
Share-based compensation																							2,172								2,172
Exercise (includes Net Exercise) of options granted to employees			154,796								*												3								3
Net loss for the period																											(9,342	)			(9,342	)
Balance at June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)			75,930,235							$	76											$	118,375			$	(61,938	)		$	56,513

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

										Period from
										December 27, 1993*
		Six Months Ended								through
		June 30, 2008				June 30, 2007				June 30, 2008
						(restated)				(restated)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss for the period		$	(9,342	)		$	(17,563	)		$	(61,938	)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:											—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle											(37	)
Share based compensation			2,167				13,044				28,551
Financial income net (principal differences relate to currency transaction gains/losses)			(916	)			47				(1,722	)
Depreciation and impairment of fixed assets			582				277				2,521
Changes in accrued liability for employee rights upon retirement			277				127				967
Gain on amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement			(81	)			(8	)			(185	)
Gain on sale of fixed assets							(6	)			(6	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable			(388	)			(963	)			(1,533	)
Increase in accounts payable and accruals			254				156				3,261
Net cash used in operating activities		$	(7,447	)		$	(4,889	)		$	(30,121	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		$	(1,904	)		$	(809	)		$	(7,726	)
Investment grant received in respect of fixed assets											38
Investment in restricted cash deposit											(47	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment							10				11
Amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement			(81	)			(59	)			(612	)
Amounts paid in respect of employee rights upon retirement							14				171
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(1,985	)		$	(844	)		$	(8,165	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loan and convertible bridge loan received										$	2,145
Repayment of loan											(1,000	)
Issuance of shares and warrants, net of issuance cost			(56	)		$	12,910				74,059
Exercise of options and warrants		$	3								14,417
Merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, net of issuance cost							(39	)			237
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		$	(53	)		$	12,871			$	89,858
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		$	1,032			$	(27	)		$	1,788
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			(8,453	)			7,111				53,360
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD			61,813				15,378				—
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD		$	53,360			$	22,489			$	53,360

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

(Continued) — 2

										Period from
										December 27,
										1993*
		Six Months Ended								through
		June 30, 2008				June 30, 2007				June 30, 2008
						(restated)				(restated)
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for interest										$	80
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES NOT INVOLVING CASH FLOWS:
Conversion of convertible bridge loan into shares										$	1,145
Purchase of property and equipment		$	752			$	451			$	752
Issuance cost not yet paid and accruals — other:		$	5			$	5			$	5
Issuance cost paid by a grant of options										$	21
Consultants’ and director credit balance converted into shares										$	80
Merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
Issuance cost setoff against accounts payable						$	65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a.

General

	1.		Operation
			Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Protalix Ltd. (collectively, the “Company”), are biopharmaceutical companies focused on the development and commercialization of recombinant therapeutic proteins based on the Company’s proprietary ProCellExtm protein expression system (“ProCellEx”). The Company’s lead product development candidate is prGCD for the treatment of Gaucher disease, which the Company is developing using its ProCellEx protein expression system. The Company is currently enrolling and treating patients in a phase III clinical trial of prGCD, and has initiated an extension study in connection with the trial for patients that have completed the trial and chose to continue the treatment.
			The Company has been in the development stage since its inception. The Company’s successful completion of its development program and its transition to normal operations is dependent upon the Company’s receipt of necessary regulatory approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) prior to selling its products within the United States, and foreign regulatory approvals must be obtained to sell its products internationally. There can be no assurance that the Company’s products will receive regulatory approvals, and a substantial amount of time may pass before the Company achieves a level of sales adequate to support the Company’s operations, if at all. The Company will also incur substantial expenditures in connection with the regulatory approval process and it might need to raise additional capital during the developmental period. Obtaining marketing approval will be directly dependent on the Company’s ability to implement the necessary regulatory steps required to obtain marketing approval in the United States and other countries and the success of the Company’s clinical trials. The Company cannot predict the outcome of these activities.
	2.		Liquidity and Financial Resources
			The Company currently does not have sufficient resources to complete the commercialization of any of its proposed products. Based on its current cash resources and commitments, the Company believes it will be able to maintain its current planned development activities and the corresponding level of expenditures for at least the next 24 months, although no assurance can be given that it will not need additional cash prior to such time. If there are unexpected increases in general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures and research and development expenses, the Company may need to seek additional financing during the next 24 months.

b.

General Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises”, and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The comparative balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and notes required under GAAP for complete financial statements.

c.

Net loss per share

			Basic and diluted loss per share (“LPS”) are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), outstanding for each period.
			Shares of restricted Common Stock and the shares of Common Stock underlying outstanding options and warrants of the Company were not included in the calculation of diluted LPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
			Diluted LPS does not include options, restricted shares of Common Stock and warrants of the Company in the amount of 12,404,378 and 10,883,292 shares of Common Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and 11,801,505 and 11,181,138 shares of Common Stock for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

d.

Newly issued Accounting Pronouncements

	1.		In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance and income tax uncertainties. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early application is prohibited. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009.
	2.		In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent company of the subsidiary are required to be presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent company’s equity. SFAS 160 requires that changes in a parent company’s ownership interest while the parent company retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for in a manner similar to the accounting treatment of equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary should be initially measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported in amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent company and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both parent companies and the noncontrolling interests.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

			SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS 160 is required to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirement which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 160 as of January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 160 may have on its results of operations and financial position.
	3.		In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-01, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements” (“EITF 07-01”). EITF 07-01 defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties. EITF 07-01 also establishes the appropriate income statement presentation and classification for joint operating activities and payments between participants, as well as the sufficiency of the disclosures related to these arrangements. EITF 07-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for the Company). Companies are required to apply EITF 07-01 using a modified version of retrospective transition for those arrangements in place at the effective date. In addition, companies are required to report the effects of the application of EITF 07-01 as a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods presented for all arrangements existing as of the effective date, unless it is impracticable to apply the effects of the change retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact that EITF 07-01 may have on its results of operations and financial position.
	4.		In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosure to enable investors to better understand the effects of such derivative instruments and hedging activities on a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged (January 1, 2009, for the Company). SFAS 161 also improves transparency regarding the location and amounts of derivative instruments in a company’s financial statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;” and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Company is currently evaluating the effect SFAS 161 will have on its financial statement presentations.
	5.		In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). The statement is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent hierarchy for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). SFAS 162 will go into effect 60 days following the Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411 “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

	e.		Reclassifications
			Certain figures in respect of prior years have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

NOTE 2 — RESTATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has restated its statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and for the period from December 27, 1993 through June 30, 2008, to change the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation of non-employees as required by applicable accounting guidance.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) requires the use of the “fair-value-based method” to measure the value of stock-based compensation. In the Company’s application of SFAS 123R, the Company took the position that an active market for its Common Stock did not exist for the first quarter of 2007, and that better information existed for the first quarter of 2007, due to the limited public float and trading volume in the market. The Company used alternative valuation methods to calculate the fair value of the Common Stock underlying certain stock-based compensation awards granted to non-employees during the first quarter of 2007. The alternative valuation methods included a retrospective valuation conducted by a third-party specialist in the first quarter. However, the Company concluded that it must rely on the traded market value of the Common Stock for the first and third quarters of 2007. The Company recalculated the compensation expense for non-employees for the first quarter of 2007 based on the traded market price of the Common Stock on the applicable measurement dates and determined that the resulting increase to the compensation expense for the period was material. On that basis, the Company recommended to the Audit Committee that a restatement is required.

SFAS 123R requires that share-based transactions with nonemployees to be measured based on the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments, whichever is more reliably measurable. EITF 96-18 specifies that the measurement date for such share-based transactions should be the earlier of (1) a performance commitment or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The Company had previously issued 2,148,569 shares of equity instruments (stock options and restricted Common Stock) whose terms indicated that performance was not complete until the applicable vesting requirements were fulfilled. Out of such options, 387,542 options did not vest at all in any quarter of 2007. Consequently, the Company adjusted the recorded expenses of such options at the end of each of the quarters of 2007 based upon the traded price of the Common Stock at the end of each quarter.

When preparing the consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of 2007, the Company’s management utilized a fair value of its Common Stock of $6.19 per share. The reported traded price of the Common Stock on the NYSE Alternext US was $31.32 at the end of the first quarter of 2007. The Company has subsequently concluded that it should have used the reported traded price as the valuation methodology for equity instruments issued as compensation. Accordingly, the Company has restated the amounts previously reported for share-based compensation.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 — RESTATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued):

For individual tranches of options for which the applicable vesting/service period crosses interim periods (such as the options issued to the nonemployee), the Company remeasures the tranches at the end of each period until the final vesting date of the tranche. The Company calculates the proportionate compensation expense for outstanding options by dividing the number of months in the calculation period, generally, a quarter, by the number of months in the vesting period and multiplying the result by the portion of the option vests during the vesting period. For purposes of determining the fair value of the options, the Company uses the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the NYSE Alternext US (then, the American Stock Exchange) on the calculation date. As the calculation for the second quarter of 2007 included an adjustment for the first quarter, the compensation expense for outstanding options held by nonemployees for the first quarter of 2007, as measured on March 31, 2007, was remeasured using the reported traded price on June 30, 2007.

In the financial statements originally prepared for the second quarter of 2007, the Company did not remeasure the compensation expenses recorded for nonemployees in the manner described above. Rather, the Company amortized the compensation expense for the second quarter of 2007 individually based on the fair value of the Common Stock on the last day of the quarter without remeasuring previous quarter’s expense. The Company has remeasured the compensation expenses for nonemployees as of the end of the second quarter of 2007 in the restated financial statements included in this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.

The following is a summary of the effects of the restatement on the Company’s consolidated financial statements (all amounts presented are in thousands, except per share data):

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (unaudited)

		As Reported				Adjustment				As Restated
General and Administrative Expenses (1)		$	6,503			$	-140			$	6,363
Operating Loss			9,335				-140				9,195
Net Loss for the Period			9,154				-140				9,014
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock -Basic and Diluted			0.14				—				0.14
(1) Includes share-based compensation			5,756				-140				5,616

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (unaudited)

		As Reported				Adjustment				As Restated
Research and development Expenses, Net (1)		$	4,626			$	694			$	5,320
General and Administrative Expenses (2)			8,490				4,265				12,755
Operating Loss			13,116				4,959				18,075
Net Loss for the Period			12,604				4,959				17,563
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock -Basic and Diluted			0.19				0.08				0.27
(1) Includes share-based compensation			1,084				694				1,778
(2) Includes share-based compensation			7,001				4,265				11,266

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 — RESTATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued):

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (unaudited)

		As Reported				Adjustment				As Restated
Net loss for the period		$	(12,604	)		$	(4,959	)		$	(17,563	)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Share based compensation			8,085				4,959				13,044

The restatement did not result in a change in the Company’s previously reported cash flows from operating activities, or total cash and cash equivalents shown in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

NOTE 3 — STOCK TRANSACTIONS

	a.		During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 154,796 shares of Common Stock in connection with the exercise of 189,460 options by certain officers and employees of the Company. The Company received cash proceeds equal to $3 in connection with such exercises as 167,440 of such options were exercised on a “net-exercise” basis.
	b.		On February 7, 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock to a newly appointed member of the Company’s board of directors, at an exercise price of $3.02 per share. The options vest over a four-year period and are exercisable for a 10-year period commencing on the date of grant.
			The Company estimated the fair value of the options on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to be approximately $109, based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0% for all years; expected volatility of 62.5%; risk-free interest rates of 2.9%; and expected life of 10 years.
	c.		On February 7, 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the grant of options to purchase 1,900,000 shares of Common Stock, in the aggregate, to certain officers and employees of the Company, at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The options vest variably over periods of up to five years and are exercisable for a 10-year period commencing on the date of grant.
			The Company estimated the fair value of the options on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to be approximately $2,766, based on the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0% for all years; expected volatility of 62.5%; risk-free interest rates of 2.9%; and expected life of six years.
	d.		In February 2008, the Company amended the stock option agreements of certain executive officers. As amended, such stock option agreements provide for the full acceleration of the vesting period of unvested options held by such officers immediately upon a change of control. The Company concluded that the amendments do not result in a modification accounting charge against share-based compensation.

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 — COMMITMENTS

	a.		In January 2008, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the expansion of its current facility. The term of the lease is 7.5 years, commencing upon the date the newly-leased space is ready for occupancy by the Company, with three options for additional five-year periods, for a total of 15 additional years. The monthly rental payment is approximately $25 and is subject to increase based on certain improvements to be performed by the lessor.
	b.		During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company entered into contracts with certain third parties in connection with certain clinical services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of such agreements, commencement of the services will begin in the quarter ending September 30, 2008. The aggregate fees payable by the Company during the life of the agreements are equal to approximately $400.

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the methods of fair value as described in SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements to value its financial assets and liabilities. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition as the Company does not have any financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the requirements of SFAS 157 except money market funds in the amount of approximately $43,000 included in cash equivalents and classified as level 1.

NOTE 6 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

During July 2008, the Company entered into contracts with certain third parties in connection with certain clinical services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of such agreements, commencement of the services will begin in the quarter ending September 30, 2008. The aggregate fees payable by the Company during the life of the agreements are equal to approximately $900.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed financial statements and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis, particularly with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Restatement

     On February 23, 2009, our management concluded, with the concurrence of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, or the Audit Committee, to amend and restate our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, and each of the fiscal quarters of 2007. We have restated our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007, statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, the six months ended June 30, 2007 and for the period from December 27, 1993 through June 30, 2008, to change the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation of non-employees required by applicable accounting guidance Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS 123R. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

     All amendments and restatements to the financial statements are non-cash in nature.

     SFAS 123R requires the use of the “fair-value-based method” to measure the value of stock-based compensation. In our application of SFAS 123R in the financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, we took the position that an active market for our common stock did not exist for the first quarter of 2007, and that better information existed for the first and third quarters of 2007, due to the limited public float and trading volume in the market. We used alternative valuation methods to calculate the fair value of the common stock underlying certain stock-based compensation awards granted to nonemployees during the first and third quarters of 2007. We determined the fair value of stock-based compensation awards granted to nonemployees that vested during the first quarter of 2007 based on a retrospective valuation of our common stock conducted by a third-party specialist. Based on that valuation, we fixed the fair value of the common stock underlying stock-based compensation awards granted to nonemployees at March 31, 2007 at $6.19 per share. For the second quarter of 2007, we used the traded market value of the common stock to calculate the fair value of the common stock underlying stock-based compensation awards granted to non-employees because we did not believe that there was a better alternative valuation mechanism available for that quarter. We determined that the fair value of the shares of common stock underlying stock-based compensation awards granted to nonemployees that vested during the third quarter of 2007 was $5.00 per share, which was the public offering price of the common stock in the underwritten public offering we completed on October 25, 2007. However, we concluded that we must rely on the traded market value of the common stock. We recalculated the compensation expense for non-employees in 2007 based on the traded market price of the common stock on the applicable measurement dates and determined that the resulting increase to the compensation expense for the applicable periods was material. On that basis, we recommended to the Audit Committee that a restatement is required.

     SFAS 123R requires that share-based transactions with nonemployees to be measured based on the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments, whichever is more reliably measurable. EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” specifies that the measurement date for such share-based transactions should be the earlier of (1) a performance commitment or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. We had previously issued 2,148,569 shares of equity instruments (stock options and restricted common stock) whose terms indicated that performance was not complete until the applicable vesting requirements were fulfilled. Accordingly, the measurement of the share-based compensation expense was determined based on the fair value of those equity instruments at each quarterly vesting date.

Overview

     We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of recombinant therapeutic proteins based on our proprietary ProCellEx^tm protein expression system. Using our ProCellEx system, we are developing a pipeline of proprietary recombinant therapeutic proteins based on our plant cell-based expression technology that target large, established pharmaceutical markets and that rely upon known biological mechanisms of action. Our initial commercial focus has been on complex therapeutic proteins, including proteins for the treatment of genetic disorders, such as Gaucher disease and Fabry disease, and on female infertility disorders. We believe our ProCellEx protein expression system will enable us to develop proprietary recombinant proteins that are therapeutically equivalent or superior to existing recombinant proteins currently marketed for the same indications. Because we are targeting biologically equivalent versions of highly active, well-tolerated and commercially successful therapeutic proteins, we believe our development process is associated with relatively less risk compared to other biopharmaceutical development processes for completely novel therapeutic proteins.

     Our lead product development candidate is prGCD for the treatment of Gaucher disease, which we are developing using our ProCellEx protein expression system. In July 2007, we reached an agreement with the United States Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, on the final design of our pivotal phase III clinical trial of prGCD, through the FDA’s special protocol assessment (SPA) process. We initiated enrollment and treatment of patients in our phase III clinical trial of prGCD in the third quarter of 2007. During third quarter of, 2008, we initiated a double-blind, follow-on extension study as part of our phase III clinical trial. prGCD is our proprietary recombinant form of Glucocerebrosidase (GCD), an enzyme naturally found in human cells that is mutated or deficient in patients with Gaucher disease. The current standard of care for Gaucher disease is enzyme replacement therapy, a medical treatment in which the GCD enzyme is injected into patients in whom the enzyme is lacking or dysfunctional. Although Gaucher disease is a relatively rare disease, it represents a large commercial market due to the severity of the symptoms and the chronic nature of the disease. The annual worldwide sales of Cerezyme, an enzyme replacement therapy produced by Genzyme Corporation and currently the only approved enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease, were approximately $1.1 billion in 2007, and $624 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, according to public reports by Genzyme. prGCD is a plant cell expressed version of the GCD enzyme, developed through our ProCellEx protein expression system. prGCD has an amino acid, glycan and three-dimensional structure that is very similar to its naturally-produced counterpart as well as to Cerezyme, the mammalian cell expressed version of the same protein. We believe prGCD may prove more cost-effective than the currently marketed alternative due to the cost benefits of expression through our ProCellEx protein expression system. In addition, based on our laboratory testing, preclinical and clinical results, we believe that prGCD may have the potential for increased potency and efficacy compared to the existing enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease, which may translate into lower dosages and/or less frequent treatments.

     In addition to prGCD, we are developing an innovative product pipeline using our ProCellEx protein expression system, including therapeutic protein candidates for the treatment of Fabry disease, a rare, genetic lysosomal disorder in humans, and for female infertility disorders. We are also developing an acetylcholinesterase enzyme-based therapy for biodefense and intoxication treatments. We plan to file an investigational new drug application (IND) with the FDA with respect to at least one additional product by the end of 2008 or early 2009. We believe that we may be able to reduce the development risks and time to market for our product candidates as our product candidates are based on well-understood proteins with known biological mechanisms of actions. We hold the worldwide commercialization rights to our proprietary development candidates and we intend to establish an internal, commercial infrastructure and targeted sales force to market prGCD and our other products, if approved, in North America, the European Union and in other significant markets, including Israel.

     Our business is conducted by our wholly owned subsidiary, Protalix Ltd., which we acquired through a reverse merger transaction effective December 31, 2006. The merger transaction was treated as a recapitalization for accounting purposes and, as such, the results of operations discussed below are those of Protalix Ltd. Prior to the merger transaction, we had not conducted any operations for several years. Protalix Ltd. was originally incorporated in Israel in December 1993. Since its inception in December 1993, Protalix Ltd. has generated significant losses in connection with its research and development, including the clinical development of prGCD. At June 30, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of $61.9 million. Since we do not generate revenue from any of our product candidates, we expect to continue to generate losses in connection with the continued clinical development of prGCD and the research and development activities relating to our technology and other drug candidates. Such research and development activities are budgeted to expand over time and will require further resources if we are to be successful.

As a result, we believe that our operating losses are likely to be substantial over the next several years. We will need to obtain additional funds for the commercialization of our lead product, prGCD, and to further develop the research and clinical development of our other programs.

Critical Accounting Policies

     Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing at the beginning of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007

Research and Development Expenses

     Research and development expenses were $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $856,000, or 27%, from $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted from the increase of $763,000 in payments to consultants and subcontractors associated with research and development. Such increase is mainly due to the costs incurred by us in connection with our phase III clinical trial of prGCD, which we commenced during the third quarter of 2007. The increase was partially offset by grants of $1.1 million from the Office of the Chief Scientist, or the OCS, during the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $806,000 compared to grants equal to $343,000 received from the OCS during the three months ended June 30, 2007.

     We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase as we enter into a more advanced stage of clinical trials for our product candidates, especially with respect to the anticipated continued progress in our phase III clinical trial of prGCD and with the extension study that we initiated in the third quarter of 2008 for patients that have completed such trial and chose to continue the treatment.

General and Administrative Expenses

     General and administrative expenses were $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $4.4 million, or approximately 69%, from $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease resulted primarily from a $5.0 million decrease in share-based compensation resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the common stock underlying the portions of certain outstanding stock options granted to consultants that vested during the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.

Financial Expenses and Income

     Financial income was $669,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $494,000 or approximately 282%, from $175,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted primarily from a higher balance of cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2008, which primarily resulted from the interest income earned on the proceeds generated from our underwritten public offering in October 2007 and from the devaluation of the Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel, or NIS.

Six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007

Research and Development Expenses

     Research and development expenses were $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $3.3 million, or 52%, from $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted primarily from the increase of $3.2 million in salaries for new and existing employees and related consulting and the costs of materials associated with research and development. The increase was partially offset by grants of $2.5 million from the OCS, during the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $1.4 million compared to grants equal to $1.1 million received from the OCS during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

     We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase as we enter into a more advanced stage of clinical trials for our product candidates, especially with respect to our phase III clinical trial of prGCD and with the extension study that we initiated in the third quarter of 2008 for patients that have completed such trial and chose to continue the treatment.

General and Administrative Expenses

     General and administrative expenses were $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $8.8 million, or approximately 69%, from $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease resulted primarily from a $9.8 million decrease in share-based compensation resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the shares of common stock underlying the portions of certain outstanding stock options granted to consultants that vested during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was partially set off by the increase of $455,000 in salaries and related expenses.

Financial Expenses and Income

     Financial income was $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $1.3 million, or approximately 259%, from $506,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted primarily from a higher balance of cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2008, which primarily resulted from the interest income earned on the proceeds generated from our underwritten public offering in October 2007 and from the devaluation of the Dollar against the NIS.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

     As a result of our significant research and development expenditures and the lack of any approved products to generate product sales revenue, we have not been profitable and have generated operating losses since our inception. To date, we have funded our operations primarily with proceeds equal to $31.3 million from the private sale of our shares of common stock and from sales of convertible preferred and ordinary shares of Protalix Ltd., and an additional $14.4 million in connection with the exercise of warrants issued in connection with the sale of such ordinary shares, through December 31, 2007. In addition, on October 25, 2007, we generated gross proceeds of $50 million in connection with an underwritten public offering of our common stock. We believe that the funds currently available to us as are sufficient to satisfy our capital needs for the next 24 months.

Cash Flows

     Net cash used in operations was $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $9.3 million was partially offset by $2.2 million of non-cash share-based compensation. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $2.0 and consisted primarily of purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $53,000, consisting of expenses paid during such period in connection with the October 2007 underwritten offering.

     Net cash used in operations was $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $17.6 million was partially offset by $13.0 million of non-cash share-based compensation but was increased due to an increase in accounts receivable of $963,000, mainly due to grants to be received from the OCS. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $844,000 and consisted primarily of purchases of property and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $12.9 million, consisting of the proceeds from the exercise of certain warrants.

Future Funding Requirements

     We expect to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future. We expect to incur increasing research and development expenses, including expenses related to the hiring of personnel and additional clinical trials. We expect that general and administrative expenses will also increase as we expand our finance and administrative staff, add infrastructure, and incur additional costs related to being a public company in the United States, including the costs of directors’ and officers’ insurance, investor relations programs and increased professional fees. In addition, we are considering a new manufacturing facility for the manufacture of our product candidates, which would increase our capital expenditures significantly.

     We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least for the next 24 months. We have based this estimate on assumptions that are subject to change and may prove to be wrong, and we may be required to use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our current and anticipated clinical trials.

     Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the progress and results of our clinical trials, the duration and cost of discovery and preclinical development and laboratory testing and clinical trials for our product candidates, the timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates, the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights, the number and development requirements of other product candidates that we pursue and the costs of commercialization activities, including product marketing, sales and distribution.

     We will need to finance our future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. We currently do not have any commitments for future external funding. We may need to raise additional funds more quickly if one or more of our assumptions prove to be incorrect or if we choose to expand our product development efforts more rapidly than we presently anticipate. We may also decide to raise additional funds even before we need them if the conditions for raising capital are favorable. The sale of additional equity or debt securities will likely result in dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could also result in covenants that would restrict our operations. Additional equity or debt financing, grants or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our research and development programs, reduce our planned commercialization efforts or obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently.

Effects of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations

     Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor and clinical trial costs. We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or the six months ended June 30, 2007.

     Currency fluctuations could affect us by increased or decreased costs mainly for goods and services acquired outside of Israel. We do not believe currency fluctuations have had a material effect on our results of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of each of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

     In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”, or SFAS 141(R). SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance and income tax uncertainties. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early application is prohibited. We will be required to adopt SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51”, or SFAS 160. SFAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent company of the subsidiary are required to be presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent company’s equity. SFAS 160 requires that changes in a parent company’s ownership interest while the parent company retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for in a manner similar to the accounting treatment of equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary should be initially measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported in amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent company and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both parent companies and the noncontrolling interests.

     SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Companies are required to apply SFAS 160 prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirement which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We are required to adopt SFAS 160 as of January 1, 2009. We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS 160 may have on our results of operations and financial position.

     In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-01, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”, or EITF 07-01. EITF 07-01 defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties. EITF 07-01 also establishes the appropriate income statement presentation and classification for joint operating activities and payments between participants, as well as the sufficiency of the disclosures related to these arrangements. EITF 07-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for our company). Companies are required to apply EITF 07-01 using a modified version of retrospective transition for those arrangements in place at the effective date. In addition, companies are required to report the effects of the application of EITF 07-01 as a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods presented for all arrangements existing as of the effective date, unless it is impracticable to apply the effects of the change retrospectively. We are currently assessing the impact that EITF 07-01 may have on our results of operations and financial position.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosure to enable investors to better understand the effects of such derivative instruments and hedging activities on a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged (January 1, 2009, for our company). SFAS 161 also improves transparency regarding the location and amounts of derivative instruments in a company’s financial statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133

“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. We are currently evaluating the effect SFAS No. 161 will have on our financial statement presentations.

     In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, or SFAS 162. SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent hierarchy for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). SFAS 162 will go into effect 60 days following the approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411 “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Currency Exchange Risk

     The currency of the primary economic environment in which our operations are conducted is the dollar. We are currently in the development stage with no significant source of revenues; therefore we consider the currency of the primary economic environment to be the currency in which we expend cash. Approximately 50% of our expenses and capital expenditures are incurred in dollars, and a significant source of our financing has been provided in U.S. dollars. Since the dollar is the functional currency, monetary items maintained in currencies other than the dollar are remeasured using the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates and non-monetary items are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expense items are remeasured at the average rate of exchange in effect during the period in which they occur. Foreign currency translation gains or losses are recognized in the statement of operations.

     Approximately 35% of our costs, including salaries, expenses and office expenses, are incurred in New Israeli Shekels, the NIS. Inflation in Israel may have the effect of increasing the U.S. dollar cost of our operations in Israel. If the U.S. dollar declines in value in relation to the NIS, it will become more expensive for us to fund our operations in Israel. A revaluation of 1% of the NIS will affect our income before tax by less than 1%. The exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to the NIS, based on exchange rates published by the Bank of Israel, was as follows:

		Six months ended								Year ended
		June 30,								December 31,
		2008				2007				2007
Average rate for period			3.5218				4.1499				4.1081
Rate at period end			3.3520				4.2490				3.8460

     To date, we have not engaged in hedging transactions. In the future, we may enter into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the NIS. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from material adverse effects due to the impact of inflation in Israel.

Interest Rate Risk

     Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash and cash equivalents. We consider all short term, highly liquid investments, which include short-term deposits with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase, that are not restricted as to withdrawal or use and are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, to be cash equivalents. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing the interest income we receive from our investments, without increasing risk. We invest any cash balances primarily in bank deposits and investment grade interest-bearing instruments. We are exposed to market risks resulting from changes in interest rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to interest rate risk. Our interest gains may decline in the future as a result of changes in the financial markets.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision, and with the participation, of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     Based on the controls evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission, and that material information relating to our company and our consolidated subsidiary is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

     Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in internal controls

     There were no change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15f and 15d-15f under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management Consideration of Restatement

     On February 23, 2009, our management concluded, with the concurrence of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors to amend and restate our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the first three fiscal quarters of 2007 to change the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation of non-employees required by SFAS 123R for certain transactions with nonemployees. The change in accounting treatment affected our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007, statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007 and for the period from December 27, 1993 through September 30, 2008. As a result of the effect of the change in accounting treatment on our consolidated financial statements, we have restated our previously issued condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and for each of the first three fiscal quarters of 2008.

     In coming to the conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of the date of this Report, our management considered, among other things, its decision to restate our financial statements in connection with its calculation of stock-based compensation awards. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined that they needed to change the accounting treatment. However, the need to restate our previously issued financial statements did not constitute a material weakness as of the date of this Report. They have determined that, as of the date of this Report, there were controls designed and in place to prevent or detect a material misstatement and therefore, there was no reasonable possibility that the computation of stock-based compensation awards will be materially misstated.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     We are not involved in any material legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     We describe our business risk factors below. This description includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Trading of our common stock is limited.

     Our common stock began trading on the American Stock Exchange in March 2007. To date, the liquidity of our common stock is limited, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but also through delays in the timing of transactions and changes in security analyst and media coverage, if at all. These factors may result in lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise be obtained and could also result in a larger spread between the bid and ask prices for our common stock.

     In connection with the merger, substantially all of the former shareholders of Protalix Ltd. entered into lock-up agreements with respect to their shares of our common stock to satisfy Israeli tax laws and contractual obligations. The lock-up agreements prohibited such former shareholders of Protalix Ltd. from, directly or indirectly, selling or otherwise transferring the shares of our common stock issued to them in connection with the merger during a period commencing upon the closing of the merger and ending on January 1, 2009. However, during such period, each such former Protalix Ltd. shareholder was permitted, under the terms of the lock-up agreements and the tax ruling described below, to sell an aggregate of 10% of each such shareholder’s original number of locked-up shares. All permitted sales of locked-up shares that may be made during such time period are cumulative. On June 11, 2008, after completing discussions with the Israeli tax authorities regarding the tax ruling, we approved the early termination of the lock-up agreements for holders of 5% or less of our outstanding shares as of the closing of the merger. The early termination of the lock-up agreements allows an additional 22,929,381 shares of our common stock to become eligible for sale on the public market. However, up to 35,875,319 shares of our common stock and options and warrants to purchase 3,046,052 shares of our common stock, or approximately 51.3% of our outstanding shares of common stock, remain subject to the lock-up agreements until January 1, 2009.

     Under applicable Israeli tax law incorporated by reference into the tax ruling obtained by Protalix Ltd. from the Israeli tax authorities in connection with the merger, until January 1, 2009, we must maintain our holding of at least 51% of Protalix Ltd. and our shareholders at the time of the consummation of the merger must maintain, in the aggregate, holdings of at least 51% of our outstanding share capital. This restriction limits, to an extent, the volume of our shares available for public trading.

     In the absence of an active public trading market, an investor may be unable to liquidate its investment in our common stock. Trading of a relatively small volume of our common stock may have a greater impact on the trading price of our stock than would be the case if our public float were larger. Further, the limited liquidity could be an indication that the trading price is not reflective of the actual fair market value of our common stock.

Future sales of our common stock could reduce our stock price.

     Sales by shareholders of substantial amounts of our shares, the issuance of new shares by us or the perception that these sales may occur in the future, could affect materially and adversely the market price of our common stock. As described herein, substantially all of the former shareholders of Protalix Ltd. (holding, in the aggregate, 65,094,232 shares of our common stock and options and warrants to purchase 3,628,826 shares of our common stock) entered into lock-up agreements with respect to their securities of our company to satisfy Israeli tax laws and contractual obligations. The lock-up agreements prohibit such former shareholders of Protalix Ltd. from, directly or indirectly, selling or otherwise transferring the shares of our common stock issued to them in connection with the merger during a period commencing upon the closing of the merger and ending on January 1,

2009. However, during such period, each such former Protalix Ltd. shareholder may, under the terms of the lock-up agreements and a tax ruling received by Protalix Ltd. from the Israeli tax authorities in connection with the merger, sell an aggregate of 10% of each such shareholder’s original number of locked-up shares. On June 11, 2008, after completing discussions with the Israeli tax authorities regarding the tax ruling, we approved the early termination of the lock-up agreements for holders of 5% or less of our outstanding shares as of the closing of the merger. The early termination of the lock-up agreements allows an additional 22,929,381 shares of our common stock to become eligible for sale on the public market.

     In addition, on January 1, 2009, the remaining lock-up agreements entered into in connection with the merger will expire which will allow an additional 35,875,319 shares of our common stock and options and warrants to purchase 3,046,052 shares of our common stock, or approximately 51.3% of our outstanding shares of common stock, to be available for sale on the public market, subject in most cases to the limitations of either Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

     There have been no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, other than the issuance of 154,796 shares of common stock, in the aggregate, in connection with the exercise by certain of our officers and employees of outstanding stock options to purchase 189,460 shares of common stock granted under our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. We received cash proceeds equal to $3,000 in connection with such exercises as 167,440 of such options were exercised on a “net-exercise” basis. The shares were issued pursuant to exemptions from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Use of Proceeds

     The effective date of our first registration statement, filed on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, which was accompanied by a registration statement on Form S-3 filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act (Nos. 333-144801 and 333-146919), relating to a public offering of our common stock, was September 26, 2007 and the offering date was October 25, 2007. The sole book-running manager of the offering was UBS Investment Bank and CIBC World Markets (now Oppenheimer) served as the co-manager. In the offering we sold 10,000,000 shares of common stock at a price per share of $5.00. Our aggregate net proceeds (after underwriting discounts and expenses) amounted to approximately $46 million. The offering closed on October 30, 2007.

     The amount of the underwriting discount paid by us was $3.5 million and the expenses of the offering, not including the underwriting discount, were approximately $810,000.

     To date, the net proceeds of the offering were invested in accordance with our investment policy in short-term marketable securities. We intend to use the proceeds in the manner set forth in our prospectus of October 25, 2007.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     None.

Item 5. Other Information

     On August 7, 2008, our Board of Directors adopted Amended and Restated Bylaws. The Amended and Restated Bylaws differ from our previous Bylaws in several respects. Our Board of Directors adopted the Amended and Restated Bylaws to modernize the by-laws and provide clarity and consistency with the Florida Business Corporation Act. The primary and substantive changes are as follows:

     The Amended and Restated Bylaws include two advance notice provisions, which apply when a shareholder wishes to present either (i) a proposal relating to the nomination of directors or (ii) a proposal relating to matters other than nominations of directors, otherwise than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the proxy rules of the Commission. The provisions require that a shareholder desiring to introduce a proposal, or nominate a director, at a meeting of shareholders, deliver notice to our Secretary not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to the date on which we first mailed its proxy materials for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders (or, in the absence of proxy materials, mailed its notice of meeting) in order to include a proposal at the annual meeting. The notice must set forth certain information, including a description of the matters proposed to be discussed.

     In each of the two advance notice provisions, our Board of Directors added a requirement that any shareholder submitting a shareholder proposal must make certain disclosures regarding any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, warrants, stock appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares of our company.

     Section 6.1 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws was amended to allow for shares of our stock to be represented in certificated and uncertificated form, which is consistent with the trading rules of the American Stock Exchange.

     In the provision regarding amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws, our Board of Directors removed the ability of shareholders to specify in any bylaw made by them that such bylaw cannot be altered, amended, or repealed by our Board of Directors.

In addition to these substantive changes, our Board of Directors made several amendments to modernize the bylaws, which include provisions permitting remote communications, expanding indemnification rights of officers and directors, and altering the notice provisions in accordance with the Florida Business Corporation Act to give notice of a shareholder meeting not less than 20 nor more than 60 days in advance of the meeting where the matter to be acted on is a merger or consolidation or a sale, lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of our assets.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description		Method of Filing
3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on March 26, 1998, SEC File No. 333-48677
3.2		Article of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated June 9, 2006		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March 9, 2007, SEC File No. 001-33357
3.3		Article of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 13, 2006		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March 9, 2007, SEC File No. 001-33357
3.4		Article of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 26, 2006		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March 9, 2007, SEC File No. 001-33357
3.5		Article of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated February 26, 2007		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on March 9, 2007, SEC File No. 001-33357
3.6		Amended and Restated By-Laws		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2008
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer		Filed herewith

Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description		Method of Filing
		pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002		Filed herewith
32.1		18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Chief Executive Officer		Filed herewith
32.2		18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Chief Financial Officer		Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David Aviezer, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 6, 2009
/s/ David Aviezer
David Aviezer, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Yossi Maimon, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc.;
2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 6, 2009
/s/ Yossi Maimon
Yossi Maimon
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

EXHIBIT 32.1

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Aviezer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 6, 2009
/s/ David Aviezer
David Aviezer, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 32.2

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Yossi Maimon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 6, 2009
/s/ Yossi Maimon
Yossi Maimon
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer